Privacy Policy
> Home page > Science Fairs > A few hints about judging > A word from one of our judges
A few hints
about judging
Unfinished
projects
A word from
one of our
judges
Evaluation
Sheet
A word from one of our judges
> Sharing the passion
> A short profile
> A question of language
> Between school and "real" science
> Getting to know young people better
> Setting a good example
> The stress of being a judge
> Experiments or study activities
> A difficult task
> You're all really impressive!


The following article was taken from the Spring 1998 issue of Science Loisir. Science Loisir is published three times a year by the Conseil de développement du loisir scientifique and 5000 copies are distributed to teachers, school principals, libraries and other partners of the CDLS-CLS network. Its purpose is to recognize the work of both young people and professionals that share their passion and know-how in stimulating the development of the next generation of scientists.


Judging a Science Fair


Sharing the passion

This month's Science Loisir meets Jacques Yves Gauthier, head judge for the Quebec finals of the Bell Super Science Fair for the past nine years. Participants at the meeting share a passion for science and the Science Fair. It's a way of thanking the judges of all the Quebec Science Fairs for their hours of volunteer work.




A short profile

A Research Fellow at Merck Frosst, Jacques Yves Gauthier is passionate about science. He is the author or co-author of some fifty scientific journal articles, and holder of some twenty patents. He has given conferences throughout the world and has, on several occasions, acted as a university keynote speaker. As a member of a huge research team at Merck Frosst, he contributed to the discovery of a product for the treatment of asthma, Singulair, which is currently being approved for use in more than 60 countries. He is a real researcher who also volunteers his time to share his passion for science.

His commitment to the Science Fair is no accident. He was already keenly aware of the shortage of up-and-coming scientists in North America. His reaction was to make a personal commitment, at first by being responsible for visits of Merck Frosst's facilities and by defending the role that the company needed to play to help develop the next generation of scientists. This path led him to the Science Fair.

"I get such a sense of pleasure from science. Never in my 15 years with Merck Frosst have I not wanted to go in the lab. It's a feeling that is very similar to the one experienced by Science Fair participants. It's that passion that we have to find a way to communicate to young people."





A question of language

"Scientists aren't smarter than other people. It's just that they speak their own language. The same can be said for lawyers or German language specialists. When two scientists talk about a carbon-carbon bond, of course most people won't be able to follow the conversation."

"In my opinion, young people need role models to develop an interest in science. Either that or major events. I'm sure that after Christian Barnard performed the first successful heart transplant, more young people saw heart surgery as an interesting career option. Just like seeing man take his first step on the moon probably had many dreaming about a career as an astronaut. These types of role models and events encourage young people to consider careers in science."





Between school and "real" science

"The first time I judged a Science Fair, I was immediately impressed with the organization. I was so impressed that, between projects, I called some of my colleagues at Merck Frosst to come and witness the event. Being the only participating judge from the company, I was worried that people wouldn't believe that such an event really existed. I really wanted to share this experience with others! A Science Fair is like the science section in the newspaper, but for thousands of people."

"The Science Fair is somewhere between school and real science. It's more than school because young people conduct autonomous in-depth scientific research, but it's not quite the life of a real scientist. In my opinion, young people need even more encouragement, not only from their teachers and parents. They need encouragement from neutral parties, like visitors and especially science judges, who know how to tell them just how close their projects are to real scientific research."





Getting to know young people better

"The Science Fair is a way of getting to know young people better. When I judged my first Science Fair, I felt such a sense of relief. The participants were all so dynamic and passionate! It's just the opposite of today's rhetoric that young people have no motivation and want to quit school. The Science Fair is proof that there are a lot of well organized young people.

Judges often return from their first judging experience completely astounded. I've heard them say: 'I never thought they could do that!', 'It's so incredibly well done!' or 'They're brilliant . . . it's incredible!' Even judges who started out feeling a bit smug or pretentious received quite a shock. Their first experience was a humbling one."

"The adrenaline that judges get and the motivation to keep coming back every year comes from the participants. Judges, after all, agree to set aside office obligations and busy schedules. Science fair participants really have to be stimulating in order for judges to keep coming back year after year!"





Setting a good example

"Scientists aren't aliens. There are eccentrics in every field and choosing a career in science doesn't mean becoming a weirdo! Every judge is responsible for demystifying the image of scientists. Judges are scientists and they are also people like you and me.

Judges are also the link between school and careers that young people may be considering. They are the proof that you can earn a living doing science; they are concrete evidence of the science world. We often see pills, but we never see the scientists (or the science!) behind these great inventions.

Science is often perceived as an obscure environment. Judges are windows into this real world, a world in which they work."





The stress of being a judge

So often, on the day of the judging, we hear participants say, "My judge didn't understand a thing about my project." These words, often repeated by stressed-out participants, bring a smile to Jacques Yves Gauthier's face. "It happens frequently that judges return to the judges' area astounded. Sometimes, young people do such an in-depth presentation that they leave the judges with few questions to ask. Often, these so-called poorly judged students are the ones among the highest ranking."

"Judges are really scared when they arrive at the Science Fair for the first time. I remember last year, at Collège Jean-de-Brébeuf, when we all entered this magnificent chapel where the Science Fair was being held and the participants applauded the team of judges. Our hands were just as clammy as theirs! After all, we know that young people judge the judges. We are as afraid of judging as we are of being judged."





Experiments or study activities

One of the ongoing debates surrounding the Science Fair is that few experiments are being presented. For Jacques Yves Gauthier, this isn't a problem. "What's important is sparking an interest in science, more than experimenting. Once students acquire a passion, they will progress on their own. The aim is to arrive at a destination. It doesn't matter whether they are drivers or passengers, the important thing is to see the scenery and to get there. Whether young people do study activities or experiments, what's important is that they discover the world of science and that they develop a passion for science."

"Every year at the Science Fair, I'm completely dazzled by what I see. It's just fantastic to see so many young people doing exciting projects. It's often difficult to say whether one project is better than another. It's mostly the details and the presentations that help judges make the final decisions."





A difficult task

"The hardest part is choosing the winners. We want to reward everyone. At the same time, I think the competitive aspect is important. It wouldn't help participants to believe that there is no competition in life. Athletes that make it to the Olympics have to compete and scientists in the world of research have to compete as well. Leading a research team in a particular direction when everyone has good ideas and is very intelligent is another type of competition. There's competition for ideas and research budgets. Being judged by our colleagues encourages competition. It's everywhere and we have to learn to accept that."

"I would certainly regret it if young people lost interest in science because they didn't win a prize at a Science Fair. One of the dangers of losing is that students become discouraged. I nevertheless believe that we have to continue to reward students for their efforts, while recognizing that they have all worked very hard. One of the things that throws me every year is what little difference there is between first and twenty-fifth place. They're only fractions apart! All participants should be proud of their efforts."





You're all really impressive!

"It disappoints me to think that young people are afraid of judges. I just want all participants to know how very impressive they are and how much they impress everyone, from visitors to the head judge. There's such an incredible amount of mutual respect at the Science Fair. The judges have enormous respect for the participants, who, in turn, show the judges the same courtesy. This climate of respect is definitely well founded. The work accomplished by young people at the Science Fair deserves every bit of respect and only the highest praise."







© 2002, Conseil de développement du loisir scientifique (CDLS). This document is distributed by the Conseil de développement du loisir scientifique.
For more information, visit our Web site at www.cdls.qc.ca.
The opinions expressed in this section are those of the authors and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Merck Frosst or its employees.